Begriffsverdrängung y Libertad de Religión. Notas sobre interpretación en derecho privado
| Autor | Salvatore Tolone Azzariti |
| Cargo | Oxford University, https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1653-9903 |
| Páginas | 90-108 |
90
Revista de la Facultad de Jurisprudencia RFJ No.7 Junio 2020 pp. 90-108
Tolone, S. Begriffsverdrängung and Freedom of Religion
Begriffsverdrängung and Freedom of Religion.
Notes on interpretation in private law
Begriffsverdrängung y Libertad de Religión.
Notas sobre interpretación en derecho privado.
Salvatore Tolone Azzariti
Professor of Civil Law, Oxford University, University of Buenos Aires
and University de Palermo.
City: Naples/Oxford
Country: Italy/United Kingdom
Original article (research)
RFJ, No. 7, 2020, pp. 90-108, ISSN 2588-0837
ABSTRACT: Religious exemption in the United States is briefly
analyzed by the effects of its conceptual lack on the system and
its operational field. The application in private law, as a phase of
the interpretation that develops control over the effects of the
norm. Then the taxonomy of the fields further highlights these
effects at a systematic level. The Private Law approach allows us
to demonstrate the conceptual displacement that is generated
by the First Amendment concerning other application fields
and the classificatory function that, about the exemption, can
be developed through the concept of the individual situation.
KEYWORDS: Religious exemption, fundamental rights, private
law interpretation, subjective situation.
RESUMEN: La exención religiosa en los Estados Unidos es
brevemente analizada por los efectos de su carencia conceptual,
sobre el sistema y su ámbito operativo. La aplicación en el derecho
privado, en cuanto fase de la interpretación que desarrolla el
control sobre los efectos de las normas y la taxonomía de los
ámbitos, aún más resalta estos efectos a nivel sistemático. El
enfoque iuprivatístico permite evidenciar el desplazamiento
conceptual que se genera por parte de la Primera Enmienda en
relación a otros ámbitos aplicativos y la función de clasificación
que, con respecto a la exención, puede ser desarrollado por
medio del concepto de situación subjetiva.
DOI: 10.26807/rfj.v7i7.265
91
Revista de la Facultad de Jurisprudencia RFJ No.7 Junio 2020 pp. 90-108
Tolone, S. Begriffsverdrängung and Freedom of Religion
PALABRAS CLAVE: Exención religiosa, derechos fundamenta-
les, interpretación en derecho privado, situación subjetiva.
INTRODUCTION
Prolegomena. Religious exemption. Aspects of its problematic
framework.
Patriae, percussae et indomitae.
“Ergo age, care pater, cervici imponere nostrae;
ipse subibo umeris nec me labor iste gravabit;
quo res cumque cadent, unum et commune periclum,
una salus ambobus erit. Mihi parvus Iulus
sit comes, et longe servet vestigia coniunx”.
In this article we try to highlight some problems
among that may be reputed essential in the interpretation of
contemporary private law, connected to the application of
fundamental rights and to the Rechtsfortbildung that follows it
(Heck, 1914, p. 179; Larenz, 1975, p. 366), meant both as an
activity, the formation of the law through the application by the
courts and interpretation, and as its systematic achievement.
This issue is of general relevance today, beyond the single
national system (Quint, 1989; Friedmann and Barak-Erez, 2001;
Canaris, 1999, p. 360), but the ratio of the particular relevance
of the Free Exercise Clause of the US system, especially about
the institution of exemption, is due to a sequence of concurring
peculiarities that describe its problematic conjoint. Among them,
the nature of its recognition and the position in the hierarchy of
sources of law, that is, the form of freedom and the constitutional
rank it covers. It follows the general application in the system,
rooted in protection also on a subjective or individual basis and
implemented through the judiciary application model (Barak, in
Friedmann and Barak-Erez, 2001, p. 25) therefore primarily
by interpretation. The taxonomic profile that is the lack of
Para continuar leyendo
Solicita tu prueba