No turbilhão da pandemia: O que aprendemos sobre controle da administração no Brasil?
| Autor | Vitor Rhein Schirato |
| Cargo | University of São Paulo |
| Páginas | 431-452 |
431
Revista Facultad de Jurisprudencia RFJ No.9 Junio 2021
Schirato, V. At the eye of the pandemic hurricane
At the eye of the pandemic hurricane: What
have we learned about the control of the public
administration in Brazil?
No turbilhão da pandemia: O que qprendemos sobre
controle da administração no Brasil?
En el ojo del huracán pandémico: ¿Qué hemos aprendido
sobre el control de la administración pública en Brasil?
Vitor Rhein Schirato
University of São Paulo, USP
City: São Paulo
Country: Brasil
Original article (research)
RFJ, No. 9, 2021, pp. 431-452, ISSN 2588-0837
ABSTRACT: the scope of this essay is to analyze some decisions
of the Brazilian federal administration concerning actions to
minimize the current pandemic of COVID-19 to understand to
which extent such discretionary decisions could be subject to a
judicial review.
KEYWORDS: public administration, law, legal rule, judicial
review of the administration, administrative court.
RESUMO: o objeto deste estudo é analisar algumas ações
empreendidas pelo Estado brasileiro como resposta à atual
pandemia de COVID-19 e verificar se haveria ou não para a
atuação dos órgãos de controle sobre as escolhas discricionárias
realizadas.
PALAVRAS-CHAVE: administração pública, direito, norma
legal, revisão judicial da administração, tribunal administrativo.
DOI 10.26807/rfj.vi9.391
432
Revista Facultad de Jurisprudencia RFJ No.9 Junio 2021
Schirato, V. At the eye of the pandemic hurricane
RESUMEN: el alcance de este ensayo es analizar algunas
decisiones de la administración federal brasileña sobre
acciones para minimizar la actual pandemia de COVID-19 para
comprender en qué medida tales decisiones discrecionales
podrían estar sujetas a revisión judicial.
PALABRAS CLAVE: administración pública, ley, norma jurídica,
control judicial de la administración, tribunal administrativo.
INTRODUCTION
The current situation of the pandemic of the
new coronavirus is modifying innumerable paradigms of
contemporary society is a complete cliché. At the level of
integration that we have today in the world and with the
dimensions that social relations have acquired (many of which
even have a global reach), a period with so many restrictions
on circulation and assembly was almost unimaginable. The
consequences are not yet fully known and will, to a large extent,
be quite profound.
In this research article, we do not intend to present
great sociological reflections on the current moment - we are
not even qualified to do so. However, a precise cutout seems to
be very relevant to be made and analyzed: how to delineate the
control of the Public Administration in discretionary acts that
institute programs and public policies.
As it is a commonplace in several works on public law
that have come to light in recent decades, the relationship of
the legality of the Public Administration has changed. From
a mechanism to protect the individual, intended to offer
predictability from the authoritarian interventions of the State,
legality started to embrace a more open vision of compatibility
between a competence rule provided by law and the act
produced by the Public Administration. The polysemy of the
Para continuar leyendo
Solicita tu prueba